My Photo

Or receive updates by email:

Delivered by FeedBurner


FIND DIANE ON...



AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Get Our Newsletter:
Green Purse Alerts!

Why My Purse is Green

Because I believe…

  • the fastest, most effective way to stop polluters is by pressuring them in the marketplace
  • women can be the world’s most powerful economic and environmental force if we intentionally shift our spending to the best green products and services
  • women have the power right now to solve many of our most serious environmental problems by using our green purses to make a difference
  • women must act – intentionally, collectively, and with the full force of our purse power behind us – if we hope to leave our children and grandchildren a better world.
  • « I'm Heading for China... | Main | China Then and Now: Field Notes from My Recent Trip »

    Michele Bachmann Wants to Crush EPA. First, She Should Go to China.

    Michele Bachmann, the Minnesota Republican Member of Congress who's running for President, vows she'll cripple the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency if she's elected. Maybe if she spent a week in China like I recently did, she'd change her mind.

    Michele Bachmann I've just returned from a seven-day trip to Beijing, China's capital, and Xi'an, the country's cultural heart and soul and home to its famous terra cotta soldiers. In that entire time, I never saw the sun or sky. Nor was I able to drink the water that came out of any tap.

    Why? The sky was cloaked in grey smog so thick it obscured the tops of buildings, not to mention the heavens above. The air, while not exactly putrid, smelled dank and dangerous -- a result of massive numbers of polluting cars on the road and regional industrial plants that spew contaminants into the air.

    I could have worn a surgical mask like many of the city's permanent residents. Instead, I opted to be a "guinea pig" and see how much the smog would affect me as I went back and forth to various business meetings and tourist destinations.

    Beijing air pollution After just three days in Beijing, I developed a sore throat and itchy eyes, and lost any desire to explore the city's beautiful parks. I could have easily walked distances of a mile or two. Instead, I took the subway to avoid breathing the outdoor air unnecessarily. Back at my hotel, I kept the windows closed, choosing a stuffy room over a polluted one.

    The water coming out of my faucet looked cleaner than the air -- but I would have been a fool to drink it. Water treatment anywhere in China is thoroughly inadequate. The country's drinking water is tainted not just by household waste but from relentless industrial run-off.

    Some government figures estimate that over 70 percent of the nation's rivers have been contaminated by the discharge of heavy metals and other toxins directly into streams and tributaries that feed into China's waterways. Water treatment facilities remove a smattering of contaminants but never clean up the water to the point where it is drinkable. And this creates another problem.

    Independent companies are privatizing the water, purifying and bottling it, and selling it to the public by the tons. What happens to all the empty plastic water bottles? They end up back in the rivers and streams when they're trashed.

    Why is China so polluted?

    In short, because it has neither a power federal environmental protection agency nor adequate laws for such an agency to enforce. Yes, the government gives lip service to reducing pollution and protecting public health. But local activists in Beijing told me that given the physical size of the country, a population of more than 1 billion people, and tens of thousands of "renegade" manufacturing facilities, neither air nor water quality will improve significantly until the government makes a real commitment to strengthen and enforce its environmental laws.

    This is not to say that air and water in the U.S. are perfect, or even good enough. A recent study by Environment America, using data provided by the American Lung Association, reported that nearly half of all Americans -- 48 percent -- live in areas plagued by unhealthy smog pollution. A water quality analysis by the Natural Resources Defense Council concluded that 22 million Americans may be drinking water that contains excessive levels of poisonous arsenic, among other chemicals.

    Still, the same Environment America study notes that "air quality has improved significantly in the last decade as a result of policies at the state and federal level." Likewise, the non-profit Environmental Working Group found over 90 percent compliance by water utilities in applying and enforcing standards that exist. Their recommendation: that EPA set even more effective standards so water quality will continue to improve.

    We can continue cleaning up our air or water. Or, we can abolish the EPA and look a lot more like China. I suggest Michele Bachmann go to China before she decides.

    Follow me on twitter @dianemaceachern.

    (NOTE: This article originally appeared at Huffington Post.)

     

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bba269e2014e8be1cdf9970d

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Michele Bachmann Wants to Crush EPA. First, She Should Go to China.:

    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    rental mobil

    Nice article, thanks for sharing.

    Tammy

    Totally agree!

    Spent some time in Tokyo and even there I started wearing masks to walk along crowded streets. The cultural norm there is to gargle with water when you return home.

    Thanks for an informative post!

    Cooper

    A more balanced post would be to cite the harm that an unbridled EPA has done to our economy and recovery (e.g. the way that the farmers and workers in California's San Joaquin Valley have been put out of work due to onerous water regulations to protect a small fish). The similarities between China and the EPA are that they both centrally controlled; why do you believe giving more power to a centrally controlled entity is an unmitigated good?

    Diane MacEachern

    In the grand scheme of things, we're on a major course correction for the damage environmental pollution has done over the centuries. Looking at the big picture, I strongly believe that having a central environmental protection agency, with strong regional offices backed up by individual state environmental departments has helped us avoid the level of pollution and contamination that exists in countries where protecting the environment has not been a priority. There is still much work to be done in the U.S., but we're much farther along than we'd be with out the EPA or laws like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act.
    Thanks for writing.

    lily

    YES

    Steve Lillybeck

    I really enjoyed your post. It made me cringe a little bit while imagined what it would be like to live in that your entire life. I couldn't believe that test results showed over 70% of rivers had been contaminated. Real eye opener, thanks for the post!

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    EcoCentric Mom
    Everbuying led light
    Green by Answers.com
    GSHNetworkMember125

    Categories